In the 1952 film East of Eden, director and darshan Elia Kazan attempts to scatter the honorable tension in the Cain and Abel baloney by characterization Cal as a sympathetic character. The ambiguity of the biblical taradiddle is trusty for much of this tension. graven image does not offer a occasion for playing Abels empower and rejecting Cains. Neither of the brothers defy a straightforward personality, and so the motivation for the murder is left to speculation. wherefore is Cains penalty seemingly mitigated and what should the reader draw from the story? Kazan and Steinbeck unitedly sort through such problems, using their imaginations to englut in textual gaps and formulating an interpretation relevant to their twenty-four hour period. Why would God favor Abel and not Cain? This is the biggest problem for Kazan and Steinbeck. Unfortunately, the biblical text does not provide a clear answer, so they must buzz off up with unitary on their own. Perhaps the sacrifice itself was bad. afterwards Adam loses or so all of his coin, Cal takes it upon himself to reimburse his mystify. Anticipating world War I, the son invests five thousand dollars in noodles and upon the wars arrival, bean prices skyrocket. Ecstatic, Cal plans to surprise his father with the notes for his birthday.
When that long anticipated day arrives, Aron informs Adam of his engagement to Abra and his father is thrilled. On the other hand, when Cal presents the money to his father, he replies, Do you speculate I could take a profit from that?...I dont want that money. regular(a) though his intentions were good, because the money came! from the war, Adam refuses to accept it, breaking his sons heart. Thus, Kazan and Steinbeck have formulated a reason for Gods behavior. Apparently, Cains gift originated from a haywire source whereas Abels was pure... If you want to get a full essay, mark it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment