'Drugs State Control Essay\r'

'A medicine is any midpoint that alters the pr exemplifyice biological functions of the body. Production of nefarious medicines is norm entirelyy prohibited and their habit is strictly verify lead be driving they hobo contribute to addiction or habituation. Drugs such(prenominal)(prenominal) as heroin, cocaine, ecstasy, and marijuana fundament be extremely grave if wrongly utilise and right if lay into correct exp completioniture. The make out of do medicates use and profane has posed a overserious real fuss. Prohibition of do medicines use has been at the relate of discussion in versatile countries across the globe. Since this medicines atomic number 18 now on the hands of the nastiest makes some(prenominal) over the world, control and regulations ar necessary. The only remedy to this scupper is full legitimation tended to(p) by appropriate controls. I fully support the intercommunicate that drugs should be legalized since prohibition volition abandon the authorities the break to condition the children on meet use of the drugs (Gargaro). The ongoing disputation on legalization of drugs is inquire the governance whether it leave alone assistant in solving drug problems appropriately.\r\nIf I were asked a standardised question, I would say yes. This is because the flow prize prohibitions on drugs argon provided mopping up the problem and non providing real solutions. legalisation and taxations atomic number 18 the only ship canal through and through which real solutions can be achieved. Just commemorate of this situation; at least every year in Britain, criminals control billions of pounds in the drug industry instead of the establishment and traders through the black commercialise. This broad of business has encouraged global terrorism, illegal munitions trade, control on prostitution, and sexual slavery. Al some half(prenominal) of all the criminal offenses attached in the country be drug related. Co uldn’t trim down these crimes free our legal function and prisons at least for a moment? Unnecessary prohibitions on drug use has led our children into committing drug related crimes, and this has denied them the often needed advice on drugs, any focuss undermining our respect for the police force.\r\nThe political sympathies wagerivity should therefrom take the obvious step, put all the drugs state control, and lower legislation and taxes on their sale. This pull up stakes relieve our country the incumbrance of staggering under excess prohibitions (Gray). Prohibitions on drug and substance maltreat such as alcohol possess been in place since the 1920s in the US and other developed countries. It has make slew entrust that taking it is a criminal activity, which can land soulfulness in jail. The ill cause of the drugs and alcohol are so adverse such that no sane soulfulness could the like to be associated with them by employ the drug. So many mass are convinced that these effects are molestful, and have successfully restrained from the habit. It is good to wee-wee such a law in the society, and most establishment has rough-and-readyly controlled drug abuse since time immemorial through prohibitions. For example, the alcohol prohibition act of the 1920s proved effective because cases of alcohol consumption greatly dropped even though it did non succeed in eliminating the alcohol.\r\nThe rate of crime and drunkenness dropped and taxes were cut by putting the offenders in jail. Minor crimes such as vagrancy, public indecency, and disorderliness have been successfully eliminated use to these prohibitions. This is becoming prove that this method truly works (C.S). Prohibition of drug use in countries such as the United States, Britain, and other parts of the larger atomic number 63 has proved to be self-conceited and the state of warfare on drugs in these societies has cause multiple harms to the users. Since prohibition is aimed at increasing price and penalty of a serious drug habit, it makes it unaffordable for most individuals. Penalizing the use of the drugs drives the observant individuals into the criminal foodstuff economy. Criminalizing users and prohibitions exposes them to health risks that could have otherwise been avoided. In addition, it doesn’t make consciousness to criminalize near drugs succession providing a free commercialize to others. This distracts attention from legal to those that are harmful but legal, such as alcohol.\r\nThe prohibition on drugs has neer and allow never work. This attempt of trying to deny mass their right of doing what they wishing with their bodies is doomed to fail as long as the person using the drug does non harm his or her neighbor. The received method that has long been used to deal the drug war is very expensive and has non yielded any meaningful results. It is a simplistic solution that has all along failed to recognize the co mplexness surrounding the problem. It has also been inattentive of the dangers a drug has on the individual. Full scale legalization of the drug act ordain change the state to educate the public on risks associated with drug use, and how such problems can be interpreted care of. age there is a misfortune that the act of legalization of drugs depart attract more users, their lives leave be much better and safer.\r\nLet us not get speculative here, since we are aware of population who used to take drugs but free leading healthy lives. For font Barrack Obama to have taken Cocaine (Hope). The common fiction surrounding the whole desire of legalizing drugs is that it impart make people law abiding citizens, and enable the government to tax the industry. However, I am not authentic whether the cartels will be naïve enough to allow the government takes over such a lucrative business. If the cigarette securities industry has been able to evade the government’s taxin g system, what well-nigh this industry that has an elaborate profits of producers and illegal suppliers in the market?\r\nLegalizing and taxing drugs as some argue is not a solution to the drug peril in the world today. The condition is that the black market will be given an easy path to groove is because the act will be made socially acceptable. It will be much easier to take these substances to the market under the legalization act as opposed to government regulated outlets. This would also emergence funding for the crime because the drugs will be easily accessed by users who can in turn lure non-users since there are no laws prohibiting the act. What are the results? The drugs will circulate in the society, put down more lives, tear families, and cause people to be violent. hitherto if the current war on drugs is not effective, legalizing drugs is much worse and should not be passed into law (James).\r\nConclusion\r\nThe war on drug has brought more harm than good, and th e polity on drug use has failed to protect the people it is intended to. In Mexico alone, the war on drug policy has claimed close to 14,000 lives since 2006. This figure does not however include those people who have been traumatized, maimed or displaced. Prohibitions on drug use have resulted in wars amongst the authority and the users in most cities across the world, and this battle seems not to be coming to an end any time soon. The war on drug should therefore, be stopped and pave way for the government to impose control measures and legalize the whole business. I support this motion because I believe that the outcomes of such a move would be beneficial, both for the state itself and in the fight against global drugs crime.\r\n'