Drama Analysis Essay

In preparing to write my drama-analysis research musical composition, I encountered a wealth of discipline regarding my topic The Pursuit of Happyness, a engage which I believe demonstrates a return to classic movie-making and withal a return to film as inspiration rather than lamentation. In my essay, I argued that, despite certain flaws and tendencies to revision historical relaity, The Pursuit of Happyness is a colossal film , and potentially mavin of the most classic American films. Arriving at this conclusion was a long and interesting road, which was partially established by the research and theme of the account itself.However, I felt determining my opinions and reinforcing them with information from my research materials was much easier than organizing the paper and expressing my opinions in solid, correctly constructed writing. One cash advance that I thought would be workable, but which proved to be only if frustrating, was to draw primarily from my testify experi ence and opinions about movies. In my original intention for the paper, I had imagined that I would contrast The Pursuit of Happyness with other films I had seen and contrast, also, the way these various movies made me feel and also what I may have thought about their technical aspects.When I tried to riding habit these kinds of comparisons in the actual research paper, I felt like what had been so obvious to me, as a subjective movie viewer, would be actually hard for others to identify with, unless I expended a tremendous amount of shoes and energy to explain my personal tastes and opinions. What seemed to work better than the inclusion of my protracted opinions was the citation of otehrs opinions. There seemed to be two advantages in citing material which countenance my opinions rather than merely offering my opinions themselves.the first advantage was that i raise certain writers expressed my thoughts and ideas righteous as I would have wish to express them myself. Howe ver, because the writers of the articles and essays I cited were paids, their words were much more succinct and circumstantial than some of my own attempts at saying the same thing. The second gain of using cited materials was that some of the opinions I cited were, in fact, slightly different takes on opinions of mine, and I dont stand for i would have needs come to understand these slight variations without having done the research.So, rather than merely reinforcement my opinions, the research materials actually modified my opinions and sometimes reinforced them in truth nicely. I felt more confident and determined in my own dissertation because I knew authoritative writers from The Wall Street Journal and other professional publications supported some of my views. The only real obstacle I face up with research was whittling down the enormous amount of accessible information.I think the Internet has made it easier to conduct wide-ranging research quickly, but that in itse lf makes it much more difficult to sift through all of the available information and pinpoint what will be useful in support of the research paper in question and its dissertation. Defining my thesis itself was also challenging. The more I thought about stating my course exactly and nowadays in a single sentence or a yoke of sentences, the less the whole idea seemed meaningful at all. I versed as I continued to work at defining my thesis that it is important to get everything set in a single direction.Im not sure if I was actually successful in presenting a sharp, simple thesis, but I tried very hard, Essentially, I wanted to show that The Pursuit of Happyness is a good film and one which also returns film-making to a role which it has steadily abandoned over the geezerhood in America that of inspiring people. I believed that the thesis statement is straight and feel it is true,. but I found that making my points in writing and spelling them out logically, as well as addres sing counter-arguments forced me to reconsider my solidly constructed beliefs.Even though my overall opinions did not change very much, my respect for the logical formation of written arguments grew steadily as I worked on my own paper. Just as it is important to think simply in many way to secure a good thesis for a research paper, it seems important tow rite simply, as well. That is, I think it is important to stay on topic and make your argument point by point rather than digressing or getting besides far off of track, no matter how tempting it is to launch into supererogatory thoughts and associations. Even paragraph by paragraph, I think, all of the sentences should be unavoidable and feed into one another.I wasnt as aware of this fact before spending time on the drama-analysis research paper. In supplement to learning valuable steps and techniques for writing and thinking, the process of writing the paper caused me to re-examine the methods or logic by which I arrive at my opinions in the first place. I think thats the most important thing I leaned in composing my research paper that the logic and formal thought that goes into writing a good research paper differs widely from the looser thoughts and associations which typically help define at least my own subjective opinions.Im not sure IO was aware of just how different my everyday thoughts and logic were from those which are necessary to present a clear, convincing argument which is backed up by solid evidence. In the long run, I feel certain that I could now make, as a consequence of my experience in writing the research paper, a much stronger argument on behalf of my original opinions.