Hinduism and Buddhism Essay -- Religion religious Compare Contrast Ess

Hinduism and BuddhismThe concept of idolIt is basic of all necessary to establish what is meant by the end point God. This landmark is used to designate a Supreme Being endowed with the qualities of omnipotence and omniscience, which is the precedent of the universe with all its contents, and the chief lawgiver for humans. God is generally considered as being concerned with the welfargon of his human creatures, and the ultimate salvation of those who keep his dictates. God is therefore a person of some kind, and the question whether much(prenominal) an entity exists or not is fundamental to all theistic systems.In counterpoint to this notion of a personal God some modern theologians confine interpreted the term God as representing some kind of overturn principle of good. This view was first developed in the ancient Indian Upanishads where God is equated with an abstract principle, the Brahman. The ancient Indian philosophers could entertain such a view because they also had a theory of karma, which really does away with the lack for a personal God. Buddhists too have a theory of karma, which is disparate from that of the Hindus, and which even more unequivocally dispenses with the need for a deity. The use of the term God to denote an abstract reality by monotheistic theologians who have no theory of karma is difficult to justify, consequently this is merely a device to apologise away the contradictions that arise from the notion of a personal God. In fact the actual practice of theistic religion proceeds as if God is a real person of some kind or other.BuddhismBuddhist godsBuddhism has 33 Gods the most potent one of them all is Indra. It is Buddhist beliefs that the gods and strong drink are with us persistently. The mountain Meru shag be compared with mount Olympus of the classic gods. Buddhists believe that on top of this sacred mountain are the 33 gods with Indra as their principal. Buddhism primary principal is moral strength and exercises. It is concluded in three regions. The first is the principles of lust, which belongs to the commonwealth of animals, humans and various divine essences. The realm of the gods consists of six levels, which are the liberation of material desires. The subsequent region compromises entities that are born in the dominion of the Braham gods liberated from lust and wishes, they constitute a term of embodiment. They divide in four stages wh... ...e if one means by originality an idea or an utterance not found previously in any creed or philosophy, or never before inculcated by any moral and spiritual leader, then surely you cannot find it anywhere. neither Abraham nor Moses nor Jesus nor Buddha nor Muhammed said anything that could not be found either in the religious tradition in which they were born or in creeds and philosophies in other times and places. Many of the great moral teachers often bring up a direct reference to others, and even if they do not, one can relate their ideas to something that has gone before.To PernillaThank you for being patient and I warrant for not turning it in the day I was to. Enjoy your trip. Sources profitswww.hinduweb.comwww.islam-guide.comwww.buddhanet.comCD-ROM EncyclopediaWebsters concise interactive EncyclopediaPrinted in 1996 by Merriam-WebsterMicrosoft Encarta Uppslagsverk 2001Printed in 2001 by Microsoft CorporationBooksReligions for TodayAuthour Roger WhitingStanley Thornes Publisher LtdPrinted in 1991The New Websters International EncyclopediaRevised interpretation1998 Edition and published by Trident Press International