.

Sunday, February 10, 2019

The Holy Virgin Mary :: essays research papers

What a sensation was make rough the Sensation exhibition in the Brooklyn Museum of Art. The focus of Mayor Giulianis proclaim was the piece The Holy Virgin Mary by Chris Ofili. Funny, he didnt give attention to some of the other outrageous works including the pubescent female mannequins studded with erect penises, vaginas, and anuses, fused together in heterogeneous postures of sexual coupling, or the portrait of a child molester and carrying into action made from what appears like child hand prints or bisected animals in plexiglass tanks exuberant of formaldehyde. Would it ever have made headlines with a different title, like Afro-lady? I preceptort think so. I guess targeting religion gets a little too personal. Giuliani said, You dont have the right to organization subsidy for desecrating somebody elses religion. If you are a government-subsidized enterprise, then you usher outt do things that desecrate the most personal and deeply held views of bulk in society. You wou ld think that the government paid these artists, right? It turns out that the give tongue to consisted of Charles Saatchis privately owned collection VIEWED in a world museum. So what does that mean to you? Well, when I found out that tidbit of information, it didnt seem so offensive anymore. Taxpayers didnt pay these young British artists to create controversial pieces. Taxpayers fund the museum itself to stay open. Museums have a chassis of exhibitions all year. What is wrong with having one displaying a private collection? This is a common thing with museums. Otherwise, how would the public ever get to view across-the-board artistic compilations of the wealthy? Some collections are beautiful, others perturbing. But, who draws this line? Who gets to decide? The individual. If you do not want to submit your eyes to horrendous, offensive creations, then dont Its interesting to note what happened to the art world subsequently Duchamp revolutionized art into meaninglessness. Arti sts seem to be exempt from the moral laws that are rachis to ordinary people. Everything is O.K. under arts magic umbrella molder corpses with snails crawling over them, kicking little girls in the head, rape and murder recreations, women defecating. Where does it stop? What is art and what is porn? What is art and what is disgusting? Where is the line? there isnt one anymore. The effect of Duchamps pranks was to point out that anything could be art. All it took was getting people to agree to call something art.

No comments:

Post a Comment